Q: I would like to address an objective of developing an ability to communicate with dolphins to the same degree of clarification that we’re communicating to each other now.
B: Go ahead!
Q: Along that line, would you please detail for me what you consider would be a workable approach to accomplishing that objective?
B: Emotion.
Q: Expound a little bit more, please.
B: Feeling, sharing, touching, physical presence with the dolphin.
Q: As opposed to linguistic articulation?
B: You can do that as well.
Q: Do they use an articulate language like we do?
B: In a sense, yes.
Q: In a sense. . . what sense?
B: It is simply not the idea of what you call your alphabet in that way. But it is, in your terms, acoustic.
Q: What is it?
B: What you perceive to be the sonic vibrations that they create.
Q: And do those sonic vibrations represent specific packages of thought that there are words to?
B: Yes.
Q: Then how would we identify… what are ways in which we can identify the thoughts that those particular sounds represent?
B: By spending time with then, and exchanging concepts in such a way that you can differentiate what they mean and what you mean – by a simple object that you can both identify.
Q: I see. Similar in a way that you would teach a child: by mimicry.
If you held up an object to a dolphin, would he make the appropriate sound?
B: Yes.
Q: He would do that naturally?
B: Of course.
Q: Very good. (It’s been done)
B: Yes.
Q: Okay. Their methods of communication: how are their methods of communication different form ours?
B: Again, in this way, you will find that they have perhaps more group concepts than you. And also the range of the acoustic will be abnormally high and low for you. For many of what their concepts relate to will take them in range beyond your hearing range. And then you may not even be aware sometimes of when they are talking – unless you can feel it, which you can.
Q: Mhmm.
B: Recognize and remember, once again, that telepathy is an empathic, emotional phenomena and it is synchronicity. Now, allow me to outline, clarify. We recognize, within your society, that many times when an individual says, “well, something is this,” many of you still take it as, “well, what is wood?” “Well, wood is a tree; a tree is wood.”
Now it is many other things, in that way. But that is a closer analogy to what we mean when we say, “the universe is synchronicity, and synchronicity is the universe.” It is not that the ideas of belief, emotion, thought, ESP, telepathy, clairvoyance, psychokinesis. . . all of these ideas are all manifestations of synchronicity, all of them.
Therefore, relate to the dolphin as another expression of you, as another expression of the synchronicity you are both representative of. Then your interactions will be only the interactions that will illuminate what you desire to know.
Q: Uh huh. See yourself as the dolphin.
B: Feel yourselves as the synchronicity of the interaction between you, and you will understand what the interaction is at any given moment. Whether it has a consciously analytical understanding or not, does not matter.
Q: I didn’t fully follow that. Could you say that once again?
B: Consider yourselves to be the interaction that is going on between you. Become the synchronicity of your relationship, and you have another way of saying, “I know what you are talking about. I know what you are saying; I understand you.”
All those statements are other ways of saying that you become the relationship between you. You actually see yourself as the interaction between the two supposed objects of the interaction. It is the interaction itself, the synchronicity, the exchange that creates the objects interaction, not the other way around.
Q: Uh huh! Interesting.
B: Therefore, before: become the interaction, empathize with the interaction itself, and you will be able to feel what is being said.
Q: So you trust yourself to be the interaction.
B: Yes.
Q: Okay. Did your civilization evolve from a verbal language to a telepathic one?
B: Yes.
Q: What were the primary steps in the evolution?
B: What I have just described: the recognition that as we discovered synchronicity, we allowed it to be real. And we understood that all of the connecting – the interconnectedness of all, and the holographic nature of all – we allowed that to be our real reality by acting as if it was.
Q: So if we wish to develop more confidence in our ability to communicate telepathically, you are simply saying we should act as if we were communicating telepathically.
B: Yes! And recognize again that the idea may be most closely expressed, not by a mental activation in your terms, but by an emotional one. Because the emotional one is a vibration that encompasses, quote/unquote, more of your being than simply mental activation does.
Q: Understood.
B: In other words, once again, it is not so much the idea – although this is what occurs as well – that to know someone is to love them, but to love them is to know them.
Q: Mhmm. Very nice.
B: That is telepathy!
Q: Currently much of the scientific community will not accept or acknowledge telepathy or imagination as real.
B: That is because it is still to them an analytical process.
Q: Okay. How would you suggest that we go about making these approaches more acceptable to the scientific community?
B: It is, in your terms, becoming acceptable to many individuals, and in this way, our only suggestion is to simply act like it. What they are doing now is trying to learn about a process by stopping it, and not doing it.
Q: How will they be able to perceive that the action is correct? Are they using very rigid methods of perception?
B: Again: when enough individuals act that way, they will get the picture.
Q: They will feel it also.
B: Yes, of course. They will see it all around them, and finally say, “well, what’s this all about?”
Q: Okay.
B: Again, understand that the ideas of consciousness originate – so to speak, to use that term – outside a time track. Everything that can be analyzed can only originate inside a time track.
Q: Mhmm.
B: Understand, many of your so-called scientists have utilized synchronicity to, quote/unquote, achieve the understandings of physics that they have.
Q: They just don’t know it.
B: Some of them do.
Q: Some of them do.
B: The ones I was speaking of are the ones that are conscious of it on their terms.
Q: Currently I have some friends that are conducting some experiments with dolphins. What they are doing is putting together sort of a computer keyboard, in which the dolphins could punch in various actions that result in a change in their environment – such as water temperature, heat, food being presented, this sort of thing.
B: Yes.
Q: Is there a method by which they can accelerate the learning process. . .
B: Only by doing what occurs to them.
Q: Mhmm.
B: Again: the idea is that we already are aware that there are individuals in your society that have taken some of these steps. If you wish to join them, then take the same steps – in your own way.
Q: So, it’s a boldness with trust.
B: And a doing. In other words, you can proceed and interact with dolphin consciousness from where you are sitting, if you are so inclined to do it that way; but from what we are perceiving you are describing, it is unlikely that one of them is going to come swimming by in your living room. Therefore, go to a place where you can interact together. Or create such a place.
Q: Well, this is the place I’m speaking of, where some friends of mine are doing research. . .
B: Then go and relate, as you will. And simply understand that it is not so much that you are teaching them, but that you are teaching each other. For there are going to be many things that are going to occur between you where you might think they are just being stubborn but what they are trying to do is get you to learn something. So do not be – how should I put it? – humanistically chauvinistic. You follow me?
Q: Yes, pretty much so, it’s like certain of these lines of research were stopped, not presented, because of considerations that it would not be acceptable to the public. For instance, what I’m speaking about is occurring at Epcot, which is an experimental. . . tomorrow at Disney World. We have a Seas pavilion.
B: Yes.
Q: And the idea that the public would not “accept” telepathy or experiments in telepathy between dolphins prevented this type of exhibit, demonstration. . .
B: Are the dolphins going to be there?
Q: Yes, they are there.
B: Then telepathy will occur, regardless of what the expectation is, in that way.
Q: But how could we overcome the reluctance to present to the public this as a possibility? Well, it would be nice to put up an exhibit saying, “Please feel free to telepathically communicate with these dolphins; it is possible, you know.” But there is restriction. . .
B: We will let you figure out how to come to terms with all the individuals with whom you are interacting.
Q: I already have; be very nice. Because one of the ways in which these interactions is going to occur is by sending them this particular tape. We’ve already established an interchange in doing it.
B: All right. Let me put it this way, if you will. Perhaps this may – or may not, it does not have to – make a difference. From our point of view in looking at your planet, if we were to scan your world in search of what you would recognize as alien, thinking species, we would find two on your planet: the humans and the dolphin/whales.
Therefore, recognize that what you are doing is forming a communication link with an alien species on your very own world. Thus recognize, that your world in many ways is unique. And unique in one more way, in that the majority – the majority – of what you would call alien races on other planets bear a closer resemblance in third-density reality to a humanoid life form. You are more unique in having one right in your own back yard that is not as close to humanoid as many alien races you will encounter beyond your world.
Therefore, it is a rich opportunity for exchange of true differences between different alien environments.
Q: Mhmm. Very nice, thank you.
B: Thank you.
>>> Click Here To Grab Over 3,000 Bashar’s Exclusive Sessions for FREE
