Q: Yesterday on the news, although I didn’t see it, one of the major terrorist leaders of the world came on with a suit and tie and said, very calmly, that they were going to target Americans, specifically the United States, and then Europe. And, um, from your perspective, what will be the way, what would be the suggested way, to approach an individual like this?
B: Now you can understand that our perspective will always be one of unconditional love. And as we have said, you can SUGGEST, as we dictated in this way some time ago, the idea that you can express to them that you know they have killed, that you have killed, and that you have both discovered together how easy it is for you to kill. ASK that individual, and ask yourselves, if you have the strength to love each other? And in this way, allow yourselves to recognize that it is ONLY a belief in your innate POWERLESSNESS that says you must FORCE your opinion on someone else.
An individual who believes in what they believe in, who believes in the idea, the philosophy, then recognizes that, if they have true belief in their philosophy, they do not need to force that philosophy on anyone, for their innate recognition is that the philosophy stands for itself, speaks for itself. And if you find any individual or any country or any group of individuals finding that they must FORCE their philosophy on someone else, they obviously do not believe in that philosophy themselves. For anyone who believes in something in that way, will simply know that it will always stand on its own merit. This is not naive. You follow me?
Q: Yes.
B: You can discuss with this individual the idea of taking back their power, you taking back your power, and recognizing that you ALL REALLY ARE AS POWERFUL as you need to be to have anything you desire, without having to hurt anyone else to get it. Otherwise you are saying you are in fact dependent on everyone else for your reality. You follow me?
Q: Yes, that’s the conscious recognition that they’re willing to accept that they, in fact, do recognize the idea that individuals do not need to conform to a specific. . .
B: If you wish to be, quote/unquote, pragmatic about it, you can allow them the analogy that THEY are the sole and single strongest support for what they are fighting against. For when they feel that they are being oppressed and they retaliate in a violent manner against a so-called oppressor, they only give the so-called oppressor that much more reason to become that much more oppressive. You follow me?
Q: Sure.
B: They are attempting to fight, in their viewpoint, a RAGING FOREST FIRE of oppression, out of control, but they are fighting it by throwing sticks at it, feeding it. You follow me?
Q: Sure.
B: In this way they can simply recognize that THEY, paradoxically, are the single most strong foundation support for any oppressive regime – for it gives the oppressive regime an excuse to tighten its grip. You follow me?
B: Totally. Yes, thank you.
Q: Thank you. Sharing!!!
>>> Click Here To Grab Over 3,000 Bashar’s Exclusive Sessions for FREE
